Thermoforming – An Injection Molding Alternative for EV Applications

Automotive manufacturers often face a difficult challenge in the production of their plastic parts. For decades, manufacturers have used injection molding to manufacture plastic components. Injection molding can be effective for large quantity jobs. However, it presents a number of issues for small volume manufacturers. It can often be costly to create a new mold. Those costs can make it prohibitive to run small jobs. That may limit a manufacturer’s ability to innovate and try new designs.

US Blogpost - Thermoforming – An Injection Molding Alternative for EV Applications - 003

Here at Deufol, we offer an alternative production method that gives manufacturers more flexibility and greater cost efficiency. It’s called thermoforming, and it’s a unique process that allows us to create molds at a fraction of the price of injection molding. That helps manufacturers run small jobs, experiment with new designs, and better manage their capital.

There are a number of companies that offer thermoforming solutions. However, it’s important to work with a thermoforming company who will act as a true partner in your business. You want a thermoforming partner who can not only produce your parts, but also provide you with engineering and consulting services to improve quality, reduce cost, and meet your goals.

That’s our approach here, and that approach recently helped many electric vehicle manufacturers improve their quality and margins when manufacturing certain applications. Below is a recap of how we helped these manufacturers. If you’re facing a unique challenge producing your plastic applications, it may be time for you to consider a new thermoforming partner.

A Manufacturer’s Recurring Quality Challenge

The manufacturer produced plastic components for automobiles. The components had two mounting tabs used to install the part in the car. Unfortunately, there was a recurring issue involving these tabs. Although the product was produced to specifications, the tabs broke on a regular basis.

This problem obviously caused issues for the manufacturer. There was the cost of replacing the broken components. And the quality issues had an impact on their project timeline. The manufacturer spoke with our thermoforming team and expressed their desire to find a solution.

An Innovative Solution Driven by Partnership

Deufol’s thermoforming engineers analyzed the issue to identify the root cause of the problem. They determined that the material used to produce the component wasn’t durable or flexible enough to support the tabs. Thus, the tabs were bending in a way that caused cracks and even complete fractures.

Our team contacted the manufacturer of the thermoforming material. Together, Deufol’s engineers worked with the manufacturer’s engineers to create an alternative material that included additives to boost strength and flexibility.

We then created prototypes of the new component and tested it in our facility and at our customer’s facility. The result was a more durable component that didn’t have any of the cracking or breaking issues. As a bonus, the new material was actually less expensive than the previous material. That meant the electric vehicle manufacturer got better quality products at a reduced price.

US Blogpost - Thermoforming – An Injection Molding Alternative for EV Applications - 004

Thermoforming can be an effective solution for plastic applications manufacturers. However, as is the case in any manufacturing process, challenges and issues can arise. It’s important to work with a thermoforming partner who has engineers, consultants, and partnerships available to help you resolve your biggest challenges.

Recommend this article:

Other popular blog articles

No posts found!

Ertragslage in (Tsd. €)

1. Hj 2021 2. Hj 2021 1. Hj 2022 2. Hj 2022 1. Hj 2023
Umsatz gesamt
110.193
132.856
129.344
142.236
143.938
EBITDA
10.035
17.440
16.278
17.755
27.827
EBIT
-129
6.469
6.414
6.809
17.870
EBT
-2.048
4.945
4.889
5.525
15.503
Periodenergebnis
-2.140
4.073
3.147
3.862
12.611
Ergebnis je Aktie (€)
-0,057
0,087
0,067
0,083
0,283

Ertragslage in (Tsd. €)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Umsatz gesamt
265.109
247.061
213.854
243.049
271.580
EBITDA
18.842
28.228
29.012
27.475
34.033
EBIT
9.811
6.238
6.200
6.340
13.223
EBT
8.103
4.018
3.301
2.906
10.414
Periodenergebnis
3.760
3.067
855
1.933
7.009
Ergebnis je Aktie (€)
0,094
0,070
0,026
0,030
0,150